Daniil Glinka vs Pedro Vives Marcos Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Pedro Vives Marcos has won 42.16% of points on his second serve recently, while Daniil Glinka has won a higher percentage at 46.53%. How crucial is this difference? It often indicates a slight edge for Glinka in match predictions.
• In return games, Marcos has secured 47.86% of his opponent's second serve points, compared to Glinka's 43.18%. Would this advantage boost Marcos's chances? It's a notable factor.
• When it comes to first serve returns, their stats are quite close, with Marcos winning 26.01% and Glinka winning 25.77%. Who might edge out here? The result could hinge on other factors.
• Under pressure, Marcos saves 51.25% of breakpoints, whereas Glinka has a slightly better rate at 51.94%. Does this suggest Glinka performs better in high-pressure scenarios? Marginally, yes.
• Over the past year, Marcos has a winning rate of 77.14% in matches, slightly better than Glinka's 70.00%. Who has the better track record? Marcos, overall.
• Marcos excels on clay with a 61% win rate, but struggles more on indoor hard courts (50%). Conversely, Glinka performs best on indoor hard courts (61%), but less so on clay (47%). Each player has surface-specific strengths.
• Both players primarily compete in $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Marcos winning slightly more at 78.13% compared to Glinka’s 74.29%. Does this impact the prediction? Marcos has a minor advantage here.
• Facing opponents, Marcos has competed against those ranked, on average, at 455.49, whereas Glinka has faced slightly tougher competition at 416.81. Does this impact Glinka's preparedness? Likely, yes.
• In deciding sets, Glinka has a higher success rate, winning 57% compared to Marcos at 45%. Could this prove decisive in a close match? It potentially favors Glinka.

Editorial Prediction (October 20, 2025, UTC):

As both players prepare to meet, their recent performances provide intriguing insights. Marcos shows strength in return games and overall match wins, but Glinka holds an edge in second serve points and pressure scenarios.

The choice of surface could also be pivotal. Marcos has a noted advantage on clay, yet Glinka performs best on indoor hard surfaces, suggesting that surface may tilt the odds.

With these factors in mind, the data seems to slightly favor Daniil Glinka in this encounter, assuming the conditions are set to his strengths.